There is a lot of talk about “inclusive capitalism” and
“inclusive growth” these days. That’s all well and
good but in addition to these, what we need is an
“inclusive government”. A government that includes
capable, honest citizens based on merit irrespective
of gender.
There is a positive correlation between gender
equality and economic growth. Countries that do not
treat women as second class citizens are more likely
to prosper in a sustainable manner, and this is true
regardless of the prevailing ideology or religion of
that country. Rwanda and the United Arab Emirates
are two classic examples. Both countries rank high in
comparative regional gender equality surveys and
both have experienced an upward trend in economic
prowess and social development over the last 10
years and 40 years respectively. In the book, Flashes
of Thought, the ruler of Dubai, Mohammed bin
Rashid Al Maktoum, says of his government: “Our job
is to provide an environment that unlocks women’s
potential – one that protects their dignity and
femininity, helps them create the necessary balance
in their lives, and values their talents and potential.
Given this environment, I am confident that women
will perform nothing short of miracles.” To that end,
70 per cent of university graduates in his country are
women. Eighty five per cent of his personal team are
women, 65 per cent of their government employees
are women and 30 per cent of the leadership
positions are held by women.
Closer to home, let’s look at Rwanda. Since the
genocide ended over 10 years ago, women have
generally made up more than 50 per cent of their
parliamentarians. Currently, approximately 63 per
cent of their Members of Parliament are women.
During that time, Rwanda has experienced year-on-
year GDP growth. Their GDP per capita, their Gross
National Income per capita, their Agricultural
Production Rate and Food Production Rate have all
increased steady over those years. Is this a
coincidence? I think not. I once heard someone say
that women are the greatest causalities of war and
he might be right. This being the case, by putting
capable women in leadership positions, we have a
government that is less likely to make decisions that
would lead to civil unrest or war. Prosperity fosters in
times of peace. The absence of confusion and an
orderly society foster progress. The more women we
have in leadership positions, the more likely we are
to have an orderly and prosperous country.
In her essay, The Economics of Exclusion, University
of Oxford Business Professor, Linda Scott, illustrates
in monetary terms the national benefits of
adequately including women in leadership and the
hidden, indirect costs of excluding them: “Taking
account of the benefits of including women should
encompass not just the growth possibilities, but the
bigger economic impact lies in avoiding the costs
associated with exclusion, such as…hunger, violence
and disease.”
In some of her other works, Scott compares the
Women’s Economic Opportunity data compiled by
the Economist Intelligence Unit and the National
Competitiveness Index created by the World
Economic Forum. Her findings show that “a country
making concerted efforts to protect, support,
educate, and place its women would be making
similar decisions across the board to maximise its
other resources.”
There are examples of gifted leaders all over the
world who happen to be female such as Valerie
Amos, Michaelle Jean, Ursula Burns and Condoleezza
Rice. We also have our fair share of such assets here
in Nigeria and in deciding who should form part of
the leadership team that moves this country forward,
let those who are gifted with skill, scruples, stamina
and a solid track record prevail.
Overlooking women for positions in leadership would
be akin to a self-inflicted brain drain. Speaking of a
brain drain, Valerie Amos is originally from Guyana
and Michaelle Jean was born in Haiti. Both women are
doing wonders on behalf of their adoptive countries,
the United Kingdom and Canada respectively. If the
right environment had existed in their countries of
birth, they probably would not have left and perhaps
they’d be doing these wonders as emissaries of their
birth countries rather than as representatives of their
adoptive countries. Let us create the right
environment here in Nigeria so that capable women
don’t have to leave the shores of their country to find
a place where their intellectual talents can be
maximised and appreciated.
Who or what is a leader?
It is said that a leader is someone who improves the
lives of those around him or her. People like Adepeju
Jaiyeoba, the lawyer working to reduce infant and
maternal mortality rates by providing kits to
pregnant women in rural areas, or Mosunmola
Umoru, the female farmer who empowers other
farmers by helping them find a viable market for
their produce.
Similarly, it is said that a leader is anyone who can
serve people and make them happy. For example,
Enitan Kuku who discovers Nigerian fine artists and
helps them sell their artwork in the international
market, or Fisayo Olowu who runs a designated
learning place for children under the age of 10 living
in an impoverished shanty town, or Yewande Olofinro
who goes to hospital wards to help those who can’t
pay their medical bills.
I also read somewhere that a leader is someone
capable of creating positive change, whether at a
micro level within his or her family or at a macro level
serving the entire nation. People such as Ijeoma
Idika-Chima, a young lady who galvanises other
young people to vote, or Amina Ahmed who despite
incredible odds is possibly one of Nigeria’s youngest
female magistrates, or Temitayo Etomi, a manager in
the Lagos State civil service, doing notable work in
her state government.
It should be a priority of new administration headed
by President Muhammadu Buhari, to “provide an
enabling environment for women to achieve their
highest potential.” That environment would be one
that protects them from violence, one that does not
force them to compromise their principles and one
that includes them on the basis of competence.
The positive change that we would like to see from
the new administration is the significant inclusion of
clever, capable, conscientious and compassionate
women in the leadership. Let us realise the benefits
inherent in our greatest natural resource. We can
create an environment that enables women to
succeed or sets them up to fail. By choosing the
former, the whole nation, male and female, young
and old, will also move forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment